Lol, how do you know it is poorly written and flagrant if you have not read
it?
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:12 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
i shall make sure t o do that.
I don't want to read it because it is long, poorly written and all
flagrant.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 17:08, Dean Masters wrote:
Well done, and there was me thinking you had just been regurgitating
stuff
others have posted on forums previously.
Why don´t you want to read it? Scared that the reality of the
situation and
who is actually at fault might hit home?
Let me know where and when you have posted it, it will making
interesting
reading again.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 6:04 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
I did yes, really dont want to read all that, i have pleanty to post
online.
thanks.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 16:59, Dean Masters wrote:
Wow! What a conspiracy theory, did you come up with all of that all
by
yourself?
So the developer deliberately completed the project early as they
knew a
worldwide recession was about to hit, CFP could apparently not get
you a
mortgage, presumably due to the economic climate, Legal Independence
did not
protect your interests and upon seeking legal advice in the UK you
were
apparently advised not to make the final payment.
Back on planet earth for a moment, do you not realize that this whole
situation is a direct result of your own decisions and actions (or
lack of),
nothing more?
Yes, it is true that we made recommendations to you, CFP, Legal
Independence
were two, but don´t forget the likes of HIFX the currency exchange
people
and Underwood Insurance. The simple fact is that they were all
introduced as
recommendations, you were not obligated to use any of them if you
did not
want to.
Many clients did not take up the recommendations that were made and
used
alternatives, such as Bulgarian Home Loans for mortgages, guess how
they got
on? I´ll tell you, exactly the same as those using CFP, in fact I
believe
Bulgarian Home Loans actually gave up on the Bulgarian market long
before
CFP. Other clients using their own lawyers also had to complete when
requested to, the developer can call for you to complete when they
reach a
certain certified stage. I suggest that you review your contracts
again
before deciding if you received bad advice from your UK based
lawyers.
You can chose to continue playing the blame game if you want but you
´ll be
playing it on your own from now on as it is clear that you have no
valid
points, arguments or intention to take any responsibility for your
own
decisions and actions which are the root cause of the situation you
are now
in.
Good luck for the future, it sounds like you are due some.
Dean
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 5:34 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
No thats not your fault, but putting us in contact with a vendor that
changes the deadline to pay money to co inside with surrounding
financial implications is.
Also a lawyer that you know and allowed us to go ahead.
And also CFP which couldn't get us a mortgage which i think is no
coincidence.
The theory goes that all 4 of you work together. V cleaver.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 16:29, Dean Masters wrote:
Thanks for finally admitting you were wrong.
Let me guess, CFP could not get you a mortgage because the banks in
Bulgaria
limited the amount they would lend or they just stopped lending. I
guess
that is our fault too, along with the global recession.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 5:25 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
Obviously i got the wrong acronym and should have said MRI.
CFP are another company you at MRI put us in contact with that are
also corrupt.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 16:07, Dean Masters wrote:
Nice try again Nathan, however you are wrong again i´m afraid.
How on earth is money paid to CFP, a separate company anything to
do
with
MRI?
Just goes to show my records are correct and that you have not paid
one cent
to MRI.
What do you want to try next?
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 5:01 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
Well if you have the records in front of you, you can see that we
paid
monies to CFP.
So you admit it. I shall send you a screen shot of a credit card
statement that shows money transfered to bulgaria.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 15:57, Dean Masters wrote:
Not at all, I have records here in front of me thanks, you made a
claim and
I have asked you to back it up, you can can´t you??
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:57 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
Are you suggesting you cant find your records, hmm interesting.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 15:22, Dean Masters wrote:
No, I am asking YOU as you claim to have paid money for the
purchase
to MRI
so back it up.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:20 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
No not as a reservation, I suggest you check your records.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 15:17, Dean Masters wrote:
What as a reservation deposit? If not, when and what for?
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 4:10 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
1000 euros
On 8 Dec 2009, at 15:07, Dean Masters wrote:
Ok clever guy, tell me then what it is exactly that YOU paid to
MRI???
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:58 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
you don't have to be you idiot, you put me in contact with the
vendor
and charged me, that makes you legally involved as a
facilitator.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 14:53, Dean Masters wrote:
Show me where we are named as a legally involved party in your
contract with
Fort Noks.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:42 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
As the people who put me in contact with the vendor you are
legally
involved. You had a direct influence on my decision to
purchase a
property.
Also the fact that you obviously are in cahoots with Legal
Independence make all this very suspicious.
You know what your company is. So do many others.
Keep writing emails, these are all great to post.
You pretty much say "buy from us, we will take your money then
have
no
responsibility of what happens next, we will let you buy form
anyone!"
Very good!
On 8 Dec 2009, at 14:35, Dean Masters wrote:
How very clever!
One thing you have failed to mention all throughout is what
Fort
Noks, the
people you had a contract with, had made payments to and were
buying
the
property from have had to say about the situation.
Also, tell me what the role of MRI is? I think you will find
that
we
are an
introductory sales agent, nothing more so you tell me what
responsibilities
we have?
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:32 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
lol, very professional of you.
I have accepted the fact that i have lost money, that dose
not
bother
me. Its the fact that companies like you can get away with
it
and
take NO responsibility.
Our exchange of email shall be posted for all to see.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 14:28, Dean Masters wrote:
As I thought, apparently you can´t face up to the truth, it
´s
just
easier to
say it´s someone else fault.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:18 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
The kind of response i expect from a company such as yours.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 14:15, Dean Masters wrote:
Unbelievable Nathan,
Stop looking to blame others and take responsibility for
your
own
actions.
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 3:14 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
I feel I have received bad advice from MRI and have been
pressured
into purchasing a property abroad.
I shall have to agree with the comments found online and
take
your
company to be no more than a money making con.
I will do all i can to spread the word that MRI and
yourself
should
not be dealt with.
What exactly did i pay you for if you take not
responsibility
after
the sale!
On 8 Dec 2009, at 10:32, Dean Masters wrote:
Nathan,
I´ll be straight and to the point in answering your
question.
MRI have no responsibility in this matter. The situation
you
find
yourself
in is as a result of your own actions.
I´m no lawyer but if your actions was based upon advice
received
from a
lawyer then to me that sounds like bad advice. The bottom
line
is
that the
contract is binding on both parties, the developer to
provide a
completed
property and on you to purchase it. If the developer has
fulfilled
his
obligations as per the contract, even if this is earlier
than
estimated I
believe it is then up to you to fulfill your obligations,
an
action
you
chose not to undertake, seemingly on the advice of UK
based
lawyers.
I do not know the specific wording contained in your
contract
regarding the
completion date, however I suspect that that this is the
latest
date
the
developer has to complete the property before incurring
penalties.
From
experience it is very very rare for any contract to
include
an
earliest
completion date clause for the simple reason that off plan
developments
typically tend to run later than estimated due to
unforeseen
events,
by
including such a clause the developer would be opening
themselves
up
to more
penalty payments.
If you feel you have received bad advice from a registered
lawyer
that has
led to the termination of the contract, the repossession
of
the
property and
the loss of the funds paid by yourself to the developer to
date I
would
suggest that you then contact the body who regulates
lawyers
in
the
UK with
any supporting evidence of the bad advice you received.
Regards
Dean Masters
Sent: Tuesday, December 08, 2009 11:19 AM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
To be honest on reflection I have read reviews about MRI
and
they
seem to be correct.
Your sales reps were very pushy and it was always
reinforced
that i
should use lawyers recommended my yourselves.
My legal advice is from UK solicitors who have advised me
not
to
put
anymore money in.
They are under the same impression as myself that thing do
not
seem
as
clear as they should and the contract is brief and
misconstruing.
May i also add that you recommended CFP who should have
got
us a
mortgage but failed! Now we cannot get a refund from them
which i
stated in the contract we would is they failed to get us a
mortgage.
I think you may be confusing my straight to the point
wording
with
an
angry response.
What responsibility do you MRI have in relation to my
situation
as
you
are the facilitator between myself and the vendor.
On 8 Dec 2009, at 10:08, Dean Masters wrote:
Nathan,
I asked a civil question, I would be grateful if you
would
simply
answer it
rather than coming back with aggressively worded
comments.
I will ask again, what was their advice to you before
advising
you
would not
be making payment as requested by the developer? I am
sure
you
sought legal
advice before making such a decision didn´t you?
Just to clarify though, we did not supply the lawyer in
Bulgaria
for
you, we
made a recommendation, you were and are free to appoint
whoever
you
want to
protect your interests in the purchase.
Dean Masters
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 10:31 PM
To: Dean Masters
Subject: Re: Fort Noks
You supplied the lawyers in Bulgaria for us.
They are Legal Independence. We have not been able to
get
into
contact with these for some time.
We are not making anymore payment and have requested our
deposit
back
from Fort Noks.
On 7 Dec 2009, at 16:50, Dean Masters wrote:
Nathan,
The contractual relationship between you and the
developer
is a
direct one.
Can I ask who your lawyers are and what was their advice
to
you
before
advising you would not be making payment as requested by
the
developer?
Regards
Dean Masters
Sent: Monday, December 07, 2009 4:05 PM
To: info@mrioverseasproperty.com
Subject: Fort Noks
I purchased an apartment with fort noks and they changed
the
deadline
for the rest of the money.
I said no to this and they have said the appartment is
no
longer
mine.
As you put me into contact with them i feel it is your
responsibility
to sort out
